1917

2019 8.0 1h 59m
1917

Movie Overview & Analysis

"1917" tries to be both a breathtaking war epic and a tense race against time, but it occasionally stumbles under the weight of its ambitions. Sam Mendes delivers a technically impressive film that often feels more like a visual exercise than a gripping narrative.

Film Director: Sam Mendes
Duration: 119 min
Genre: War, History
Year: 2019

Visually Impressive, Yet Flawed

"1917" is a visually stunning war film that's worth watching, especially for its groundbreaking cinematography and immersive experience. While it may not fully deliver on emotional depth and character development, it effectively captures the tension and horror of its setting, making it a noteworthy addition to the war film genre.

7.8/10

Film DNA

The scores reflect a strong visual impact and decent entertainment value, but the emotional weight and story depth leave much to be desired.

Pros

  • Groundbreaking cinematography
  • Intense real-time storytelling

Cons

  • Underdeveloped characters
  • Pacing issues in quieter moments

For War Film Enthusiasts

"1917" will appeal to war film aficionados and those who appreciate technical filmmaking, particularly fans of Mendes' work. However, viewers looking for deep character exploration or a traditional narrative might find their patience tested. Those who prefer dialogue-driven plots may walk away feeling unfulfilled, as the film emphasizes visual storytelling and real-time pacing over emotional engagement. It's definitely a film for those who enjoy the adrenaline of a ticking clock, but it may frustrate those not willing to overlook its narrative shortcomings.

A Race Against Time

Set during World War I, "1917" follows two British soldiers, Lance Corporals Schofield and Blake, tasked with delivering a critical message to save a battalion from walking into a deadly trap. The film unfolds in real time, showcasing their treacherous journey through enemy territory. As they navigate war-torn landscapes, they encounter various challenges, from the horrors of trench warfare to the unpredictable chaos of battle. Mendes aims to immerse viewers in the tension and urgency of their mission, but the story's depth suffers from a lack of character development and emotional engagement, making the stakes feel somewhat diminished despite the film’s stunning visuals.

Solid Performances, Limited Depth

George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman deliver solid performances as the two leads, with MacKay particularly shining in conveying the intense fear and determination his character faces. However, some of the supporting cast, including Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch, are frustratingly underutilized, providing more of a brief spark than any lasting impact. Andrew Scott's role as Lieutenant Leslie adds some depth to the otherwise sparse character interactions, but the film could have benefited from deeper exploration of its characters’ motivations and backgrounds. As a result, while the performances are commendable, they often lack the emotional resonance needed to elevate the stakes.

Stunning Visuals, Uneven Pacing

Mendes employs a unique one-shot style that immerses the viewer in the journey alongside Schofield and Blake. The cinematography by Roger Deakins is undoubtedly a highlight, presenting breathtaking shots of war-torn fields and bombed-out buildings. However, this focus on visual splendor sometimes overshadows coherent storytelling, leading to moments where style comes at the expense of substance. The pacing can drag in sections, particularly during quieter moments that lack significant developments. Still, the immersive sound design and carefully crafted visuals provide a visceral experience that pulls the audience into the horrors of war, even if it doesn't fully connect emotionally.

Tension with Emotional Gaps

Watching "1917" can be an emotionally stark experience. While the film's technical merits create moments of sheer tension, the limited character development can lead to feelings of detachment. It’s hard to feel the weight of their mission when there’s insufficient backstory or personal stakes involved. Some sequences feel drawn out, leading to moments of frustration as the film occasionally trades substance for style. That said, there are impactful scenes that evoke a sense of despair and urgency, especially as the clock ticks down on their mission. The emotional highs are there but feel sporadic rather than sustained throughout the runtime.

Watch if you liked: Dunkirk, Saving Private Ryan