2:22

2017 6.0 1h 39m

Movie Overview & Analysis

2:22 is an attempt to blend sci-fi with romance and psychological thrills, but it often feels like an exercise in frustration rather than revelation. While the premise is intriguing, the execution leaves much to be desired.

Film Director: Paul Currie
Duration: 99 min
Genre: Science Fiction, Mystery, Thriller, Romance
Year: 2017

Close But Lacking Impact

2:22 has an interesting premise and a couple of decent performances, but it ultimately struggles under the weight of its own ambition. While it provides some engaging moments, the film's flaws prevent it from achieving its potential.

6.2/10

Film DNA

The radar scores reflect a film that has some originality but struggles with emotional engagement and visual coherence. It may appeal to a niche audience but lacks replay value.

Pros

  • Intriguing premise with time manipulation
  • Some decent performances

Cons

  • Convoluted plot and pacing issues
  • Underdeveloped characters

Niche Audience Appeal

This film might appeal to those who enjoy quirky sci-fi romances with a side of mystery, but it is certainly not for everyone. Fans of tightly woven narratives will likely be put off by the film's pacing issues and unresolved plot threads. Those seeking a light, casual watch may find themselves irritated by the convoluted storyline and lack of satisfying resolutions. Conversely, if you're looking for a cerebral thriller with clever time-related twists, 2:22 may disappoint.

Time Loop with a Love Twist

The film follows Dylan Branson, an air traffic controller whose life spirals after a near-collision incident caused by a mysterious flash of light. Suspension leads him to notice an unsettling pattern of events that recur daily, climaxing at 2:22 p.m. Despite this supernatural twist, Dylan's personal life complicates things further when he enters a relationship with Sarah, a woman with her own baggage. The story tries to weave time manipulation with romance and mystery, but it often stumbles over its convoluted plot mechanics and lacks the depth needed to explore its themes fully.

Performances That Lack Depth

Michiel Huisman delivers a passable performance as Dylan, portraying the confusion and obsession that drives his character. Teresa Palmer as Sarah has moments of charm but often feels underutilized, her potential hindered by a script that doesn't flesh out her backstory. Supporting characters, like Sam Reid's Jonas, add little to the narrative, making them feel more like plot devices than real people. The chemistry between the leads is lukewarm at best, which diminishes the emotional stakes in their relationship.

Inconsistent Visual Storytelling

Director Paul Currie attempts to create a tense atmosphere with various visual motifs, particularly around the recurring time loop, but the overall execution lacks coherence. The pacing often drags, especially in the mid-section, where repetitive sequences can feel tedious rather than suspenseful. Some cinematographic choices try to amplify the film's eerie elements, but they ultimately fall flat, leaving viewers wishing for a more engaging visual style. The disjointed narrative structure makes it difficult to appreciate the visual storytelling.

Frustrating Viewing Experience

Watching 2:22 can feel like a slog at times, as the repetitive nature of the plot becomes tiresome rather than thrilling. The moments of supposed tension are undermined by the film's uneven pacing, leading to a sense of frustration rather than excitement. There are emotional beats meant to resonate, but they get lost in convoluted plot twists and unearned revelations. The film tries to evoke feelings of urgency and romantic tension, but the lack of character development leaves viewers feeling distant and disengaged.

Watch if you liked: The Fifth Element, Love Type D